Credit: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Does Trump’s Russia reset undermine the Ukraine peace process?

Last year, US President Donald Trump focused his campaign on ending the Russia-Ukraine War. His actions to accomplish this goal are now rapidly altering the geopolitical landscape. Trump’s dedication to securing a peace agreement clearly echoed with American voters, who are tired of funding a brutal confrontation that is now in its fourth year. Nevertheless, his obvious emphasis on rebuilding relations with Moscow while pressuring Kyiv is sparking mounting warnings.

In recent weeks, there has been a remarkable shift in tone that has been underscored by a landmark announcement that the United States plans to dramatically decrease its role in European security.

The first indication of a significant shift in US policy toward the fighting in Eastern Europe was the decision to launch bilateral discussions with Russia without Ukrainian or European involvement. 

Moreover, Zelenskyy’s White House visit plunged into a painful and very public Oval Office argument that sent ripples around the world.  While Trump has assumed an increasingly uncompromising posture toward Ukraine, his Russian engagement has so far been characterized by complimentary language, words of trust, and discussion of new economic opportunities. 

It is not difficult to understand why some in the US may be nervous or worried regarding Trump’s approach to restoring connections with Russia. While polls have demonstrated gradually declining public support for Ukraine, most data demonstrates that a majority still back the nation in its war against Russia’s continued invasion. 

Among the most pointed criticisms of Trump’s measures to facilitate negotiations between Russia and Ukraine has come from Republican congressman Don Bacon, who stated the US leader should not have called Zelenskyy a dictator and also indicated he was far from alone in thinking so.

Additionally, there has been pushback from Trump supporters within the US media. As the president’s remarks on Ukraine’s Zelenskyy escalated, Fox News host and longtime Trump supporter Mark Levin reacted by saying,

“MAGA doesn’t support Putin.”

Meanwhile, the normally pro-Trump New York Post ran a front page story featuring a giant portrait of Vladimir Putin alongside the banner headline: “President Trump: This is a dictator.”

Lisa Murkowski, the second most senior Republican woman in the US Senate, was one of the few party members to directly express her worry following the catastrophic recent Oval Office session.

“I know foreign policy is not for the faint of heart, but right now, I am sick to my stomach,”

she commented.

“The administration appears to be walking away from our allies and embracing Putin, a threat to democracy and US values around the world.”

The time has not yet come for serious domestic opposition to Trump’s Russia approach. After more than three years of severe bloodshed in Ukraine, many accept his struggles to break the diplomatic stalemate and will praise loudly if he is able to negotiate some kind of agreement. However, recent indications of discontent from Trump’s Republican Party associates and his own support base should act as a warning against any endeavor to leave Ukraine entirely or set a Kremlin-friendly peace.

Share this page:

Related content

AI-Driven Intelligence: Transforming Tactical Operations

AI-Driven Intelligence: Transforming Tactical Operations

Artificial intelligence (AI) has quickly evolved as a theoretical device that has developed into a core asset that is defining the essence of intelligence operations by 2025. The governments, defense,…
Queensland’s Counter-Terrorism Success Masks Persistent Threats to Civil Liberties

Queensland’s Counter-Terrorism Success Masks Persistent Threats to Civil Liberties

Queensland remains a key actor in the domestic counter-terrorism system of Australia, with one of the most modernised and integrated security systems. Queensland Counter-Terrorism Strategy and Plan 2025 adds to…
How the Global Parliamentary Conference on Counter-Terrorism Can Reform Laws?

How the Global Parliamentary Conference on Counter-Terrorism Can Reform Laws?

In 2025, terrorism remains a fluid and adaptive threat, with actors ranging from ideologically driven individuals to sophisticated transnational networks. With the new technologies (encrypted messaging applications, drones, decentralized cryptocurrencies)…