Fact Sheet: UK’s Islamophobia Debate

No data was found
Photo by Stefano Guidi/LightRocket via Getty Images

– On 15th May the UK government refused to adopt a definition of Islamophobia that had been recommended by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims;

– The APPG is chaired by MPs Wes Streeting (Labour) and Anna Soubry (Change UK) who proposed a House of Commons debate on the issue;

– Muslims are a primary target for far-right extremists in the UK, see details of the trend in this Tactics Analysis;

– Anxieties around Islamophobia increased following the terrorist attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand in April;

– Tactics has raised alarm about an apparent correlation between the rise of white supremacist activities and increasingly extreme rhetoric being adopted by mainstream politicians and media. See our analysis;

– Despite the need for action over Islamophobia, including with a clear-cut definition, the chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC,) Martin Hewitt, has claimed that creation of an official definition of Islamobhobia by the government would hinder counter-terrorism operations. His concerns are echoed by Neil Basu, assistant commissioner at Scotland Yard, who speaks about terrorism on behalf of police chiefs;

– The definition of Islamophobia proposed by the APPG, and approved by Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, could make it a racist offence to criticise Islam as a religion or “Muslimness” as an identity. Current law defines racism in terms of skin colour and ethnicity, not religion. The change proposed by the APPG could enable victims of discrimination to take legal action more easily;

– Hewitt and Basu wrote to UK prime minister Theresa May to warn her that the proposed changes could “undermine many elements of counter-terrorism powers and policies”;

– Specific fears included the impact on stop-and-search at the UK’s ports, the ability to outlaw terrorist groups and ban extremists from disseminating offensive material designed to radicalise;

– The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe uses the phrase “bias against Muslims” rather than “Islamophobic”;

– Despite rejecting the APPG’s proposed definition, the communities secretary, James Brokenshire MP, has announced the government’s process for establishing a definition of Islamophobia. Two expert advisers will lead a study, in collaboration with the cross-government Anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group, to draw up a definition the government hopes will safeguard its ability to enact counter-terrorism policies.

Share this page:

Related content

The Diplomatic Challenge: Discouraging UAE's Trade with Russia to Foster Stability

In a pivotal and strategically significant development, the United States, alongside its British and European Union counterparts, is taking a decisive and calculated stance regarding the United Arab Emirates (UAE).…
Condemning the Arms Trade Between the Emirates, Montenegro: A Threat to Global Security and Stability

Condemning the Arms Trade Between the Emirates, Montenegro: A Threat to Global Security and Stability

Introduction The Tactics Institution for Security and Counter-Terrorism vehemently condemns the alarming arms trade occurring between the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Montenegro. This illicit trade not only undermines regional…
China and Europe: Safeguarding Europe's National Security

China and Europe: Safeguarding Europe's National Security

China’s espionage activities targeting Europe have become a pressing concern for the region’s national security. As China continues to assert its influence on the global stage, it has increasingly employed…