Credit: bbc.com

Afghanistan and Pakistan—UK, EU, and U.S. Strategies Against Taliban-Linked Militancy

The resurgence of Taliban-linked militancy in Afghanistan and Pakistan has intensified regional and international security concerns. The UK, EU, and U.S. are navigating a complex landscape to curb threats from groups like Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and ISIS-K while managing diplomatic relations with the Taliban regime in Kabul. This issue remains urgent due to escalating terrorist attacks, fragile regional alliances, and critical global counterterrorism stakes.

Key Facts & Figures

Significant security concerns underpin Western strategies in the region. The Taliban retook control of Afghanistan on August 15, 2021, maintaining links to militant groups including al-Qaeda and TTP, which continue to destabilize Pakistan and threaten global security. Pakistan has faced over 400 attacks attributed to the TTP since late 2021, resulting in hundreds of casualties among security personnel. Despite withdrawing combat forces by 2014, the UK retains intelligence and diplomatic roles aimed at regional security.The ISIS-Khorasan Province (ISIS-K) is an increasingly potent actor in eastern Afghanistan, exploiting local grievances and challenging both the Taliban and Western interests. Notably, a U.S. drone strike in July 2022 eliminated al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul, highlighting ongoing militant networks operating under Taliban protection. Afghanistan remains the world’s largest producer of illicit opium, with heroin trafficking routes feeding European markets and funding insurgencies. The EU’s Counter-Terrorism Action Plan targets border security, financial networks, and digital threats, while concerns grow over weapons trafficking from seized Western equipment falling into militant hands.

Background / Political History

The 2001 U.S.-led intervention initially ousted the Taliban for sheltering al-Qaeda post-9/11, ushering in a prolonged phase of international military and development engagement. The UK and EU supplemented U.S. efforts with diplomatic and reconstruction initiatives. However, persistent governance failures, insurgent resilience, and geopolitical shifts culminated in Western troop withdrawals and the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.

Since the Taliban takeover, Western policies have focused on “over-the-horizon” counterterrorism, strict sanctions, and withholding diplomatic recognition, linking international engagement to Taliban compliance on security and human rights issues. This approach underscores an emphasis on destabilizing terrorist operations without direct military presence.

Main Actors & Stakeholders: Policy Stances and Motives

The Taliban regime in Afghanistan seeks international legitimacy but continues harboring terrorist groups including al-Qaeda and TTP militants, undermining regional stability. Pakistan faces recurrent attacks from the TTP, which operates from Afghan sanctuaries, prompting Islamabad to conduct counterstrikes across the border and issue warnings. Pakistan’s government faces mounting internal pressure balancing national security against diplomatic management of the Taliban.

The United States prioritizes risk containment via drone strikes, intelligence cooperation with Pakistan, and limited engagement with the Taliban. The European Union emphasizes fortified border controls, intelligence sharing, and financial countermeasures aimed at terrorist financing networks. The UK aligns closely with U.S. and EU policies, maintaining strategic intelligence and diplomatic channels engaged in the region.

Among non-state actors, the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues aggressive attacks targeting Pakistani forces, emboldened by its Afghan safe havens. Meanwhile, the ISIS-K faction exploits fissures between the Taliban and other militants, posing a persistent threat to Western and regional interests. Al-Qaeda remains resilient but constrained under continued U.S. counterterrorism focus.

Current Developments and Laws Shaping the Debate

Recent months have witnessed intensified Pakistani cross-border strikes against TTP bases, resulting in militant and civilian casualties and straining Kabul-Islamabad relations. In early 2025, Pakistan implemented a new anti-extremism policy, featuring enhanced intelligence operations, border security, and mass expulsions of undocumented Afghans, though its effectiveness remains contested.

The EU revised its Counter-Terrorism Action Plan in 2024, reinforcing real-time intelligence exchanges, biometric screenings, and counter-radicalization programs involving Afghan civil society. The U.S. is conducting a strategic policy review, emphasizing deterrence and precision disruption over broad engagement. Meanwhile, sanctions and conditional humanitarian aid persist as key levers to influence Taliban acts and encourage global norms.

Challenges & Risks: Political, Economic, and Security

The primary risks involve the Taliban’s ambiguous role in controlling terrorist safe havens and militant factions, perpetuating threats both regionally and globally. The continuing spate of TTP attacks provokes military retaliation by Pakistan, risking escalations with civilian casualties and further destabilization.

Drug trafficking and arms smuggling remain critical funding sources for insurgents, with Opium production contributing to extensive organized crime networks reaching Europe. The humanitarian crisis deepens as refugee expulsions and instability fuel potential radicalization and create conditions for sustained militancy.

Current Western counterterrorism methods—relying heavily on “over-the-horizon” strikes and intelligence cooperation—are constrained by limited resources and intelligence gaps, raising doubts about their long-term efficacy. These challenges complicate diplomatic efforts and regional security dynamics.

Implications for Politics, Alliances, and Public Sentiment

Domestically, governments in the UK, EU, and U.S. grapple with balancing national security imperatives against humanitarian pressures and geopolitical considerations. Voters increasingly support stringent security policies, including increased surveillance, border controls, and stringent counter-radicalization programs.

Pakistan’s political leadership faces intensifying public demands for effective security amid rising militant violence, which affects regional stability and electoral politics. Internationally, transatlantic cooperation solidifies in intelligence and counterterrorism, although the evolving roles of China, Russia, and Iran in Afghanistan introduce new strategic complexities.

The issue shapes foreign policy discourse, impacting decisions on aid, recognition of the Taliban, military engagement, and international alliances. Failure to contain Taliban-linked groups risks triggering major terrorist acts with global consequences while fueling migration crises and threatening fragile South Asian geopolitics.

Share this page:

Related content

Countering Online Radicalization: UK, EU, and U.S. Approaches to Social Media Regulation

Countering Online Radicalization: UK, EU, and U.S. Approaches to Social Media Regulation

Online radicalization through social media presents escalating security and societal risks, prompting urgent regulatory measures across the UK, EU, and U.S. Governments struggle to balance safeguarding freedom of expression with…
Combating Maritime Terrorism and Piracy: NATO, EU Naval Forces, and Global Security

Combating Maritime Terrorism and Piracy: NATO, EU Naval Forces, and Global Security

Maritime terrorism and piracy represent critical threats to global trade routes, which are the lifelines of economic stability worldwide. The roles of NATO and EU naval forces have become increasingly…
Preventing Homegrown Extremism in the UK and EU: Policies, Challenges, and Successes

Preventing Homegrown Extremism in the UK and EU: Policies, Challenges, and Successes

Date: August 13, 2025 Homegrown extremism remains a critical threat to the UK and EU’s internal security. Recent terror attacks and radicalization trends highlight the urgent need for robust counter-extremism…